Latest News | There is no new decision on increasing pensions in Kosovo Latest News | Weekly Review: False allegations about the KSF in Gaza, generic images… Latest News | Forms of misinformation that may appear about the KSF mission in Gaza Latest News | 29.2% of EU citizens verified information online in 2025 Latest News | The title generalizes budget expenditures by inaccurately presenting them as spending… Latest News | False claim that two KSF soldiers lost their lives in Gaza after an attack... Latest News | The title does not indicate that the three-day supply guideline applies to citizens… Latest News | Tieger did not say that Thaçi and Veseli killed Serbian policemen, the audio was found… Latest News | Senator-elect El-Sayed has not openly stated his intention to close the camp… Latest News | Misusing media logos to present fake news as real…
[ ARTICLE ]

Pro-government media in Russia and Belarus are waging a disinformation campaign against EU projects

HIBRID

For pro-Kremlin media, the Eastern Partnership (EaP) has always been an “anti-Russian” and “anti-Belarusian” tool used “aggressively” by the European Union for malicious purposes: to exercise external control over Belarus; to damage Belarusian identity and to separate Belarus from Russia.

The main disinformation narratives in pro-Kremlin media say that “EaP” was behind the protesters against the results of the 2020 Belarusian presidential election, which were rigged. As claimed Sputnik Belarus, EaP had become the reason for “Western networks” to penetrate Belarus for almost all political events in the post-Soviet space, which the Kremlin did not like. In the recent period (a year and a half), since the fraudulent Belarusian elections in August 2020, pro-Kremlin media have continued to declare the Belarusian opposition as a “puppet of the West"and describe pro-democracy supporters as terrorists and Nazi.

Belarusian state media – a pro-Kremlin media double act

Until last year's elections, state media in Belarus, although skeptical and critical of the Eastern Partnership and the EU, had avoided such outrageous disinformation and propaganda. Now, however, the rhetoric of state media neatly aligns with that of pro-Kremlin media. The EU is allegedly involved in hybrid wars and color revolutions, is supporting Nazism (click here) in Belarus and is violating Belarusian sovereignty. In short, the Eastern Partnership is now being demonized just as vigorously in Belarusian state media as in Russian state-controlled media.

Hostility and disinformation towards and about the Eastern Partnership and the EU increased again after Belarus suspended its participation in the EaP in June 2021. According to Belarus Segodnya (see here), the source of the presidential administration, the goal of the EaP was to deprive Belarus of sovereignty:

"It became clear that the support of the so-called 'civil society' within the initiative (Eastern Partnership) turns into subversive activities aimed at overthrowing the Government, sponsoring destructive forces, which at the right moment, as if on command, begin to shake society."

According to a Belarusian official (see here) quoted by the same newspaper, the Eastern Partnership policy was pure bribery:

"Europe tried to corrupt Belarusian civil society. For example, we will give you $3 billion if you stop communicating with Russia and overthrow your president – ​​this is not the height of cynicism, is it?"

But propaganda doesn't work: a decline in trust in state media

However, these disinformation narratives no longer have the reach they once had. Research suggests that a) state media is no longer the primary source of information for most people, and b) state media is only trusted by a minority of the population. A December 2020 poll (see here) found that Belarusian and Russian state television channels were the main sources of information for only 12.7 percent of Belarusians living in cities with over 20,000 inhabitants. Further, a survey in January 2021 (see here) with people in urban areas showed that state media was trusted by only 16.3 percent. Independent (online) media enjoyed the highest levels of trust at 49.5 percent, greater than levels of trust in the church.

(Full article in English)

Report

Help us improve by reporting your problems or suggestions.

0 / minimum 10 characters