The portal "gazetainfokus.com" has published an article titled "Not even his employees vote for Ramiz Kelmendi."
The title of this article is tendentious and does not match the content of the text.
The content discusses the number of votes that the owner of the 'Elkos' company, Ramiz Kelmendi, managed to receive during the last elections, as a candidate for the Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK), claiming to argue that he was not even voted for by the employees of his company.
So, this article does not present any facts that argue the claim made in the title, that Kelmendi's workers did not vote for him to become an MP.
Text of the article published on "gazetainfokus.com":
"Not even his workers vote for Ramiz Kelmendi"
Despite the large number of employees he has and the hope he had that he would gain their trust, the owner of the 'Elkos' company, Ramiz Kelmendi, has not managed to secure enough votes to become a member of the Kosovo Assembly, writes Gazeta inFokus. In the final results published by the CEC, Kelmendi received only 4,607 votes. The well-known Kosovar businessman had joined PDK for the second time a few weeks before the elections, but this time he remained outside the Parliament. In the extraordinary elections, PDK managed to win 19 mandates. /Gazeta inFokus/
Link to the article published on "gazetainfokus.com":
Analyze:
The portal “gazetainfokus.com” has claimed without facts that employees in Ramiz Kelmendi’s companies did not vote for him as a deputy in the February 14 elections. The article does not present any data that argues that employees in Kelmendi’s company did not vote for him as a deputy. Arguing this claim as such is difficult to achieve, given that according to the Law on Elections in Kosovo, it is foreseen that citizens’ votes must be secret, which indicates that voter identification is illegal. For this reason, the title of this article does not match the content of the text.
After fact-checking analysis conducted by hibrid.info, it appears that this article is assessed as "unverified content" and "misinformation".
Reasoning:
The “Unverified” rating is given to those media reports that do not provide sufficient information to confirm the claims made in the report, and which have not been able to confirm the same due to the lack or non-possession of reliable sources.
A “Disinformation” rating is given to media reporting that contains a “mix” of inaccurate sources or even half-truthful content. This rating will also address reports that have incorrect attributions or headlines that do not reflect the text in terms of information accuracy.