Latest News | Trump did not demand the release of former KLA leaders until December Latest News | Weekly Review: Misinformation Claims About The Hague Verdict, Containing… Latest News | The title does not indicate that the minimum wage of up to 1400 euros applies to Montenegro Latest News | “They brought me a ram and told me to blow on it […]” – audio generated by… Latest News | Serbian media on the Hague verdict against former KLA leaders: from "punishment... Latest News | Russian and Serbian media falsely portray the protest in Tirana as a "riot" for... Latest News | It is baseless to claim that Albin Kurti has been positively evaluated in reports… Latest News | The photo of the 2022 protest is manipulated, the caption is changed to… Latest News | Musliu's old statement is being presented as a reaction to the decision in... Latest News | The murder of Xhemail Mustafa is falsely presented as part of the Hague verdict...
[ ARTICLE ]

Reasons for verifying visual content

FESTIM RIZANAJ

Why is it so important to verify sources and visual materials? In today's digital world, it is very easy for malicious actors to create and share fake news that is convincing and difficult to detect as fake. There have been many cases where the reputation of professional journalists and news organizations has been damaged by the sharing and republishing of false information, photos, videos, or information from fake people. In some cases, they have even misinterpreted satirical materials, distributing or publishing them as fact.

The problem is exacerbated by the large volume of visual materials on the internet, as any of them can be used out of context and recycled into other events or news, as we see happen almost daily around the world with fraudsters and forgers who lie to both politicians and professional journalists.

While it may not be possible to determine with complete certainty the provenance of visual materials, there are a number of telltale signs of problematic spots that can be detected through a simple verification process that asks these questions:

  • Is it original material, or was it "copied" from previous reports and fraudulently appropriated?
  • Has the content been digitally manipulated?
  • Can we confirm the time and place where the photograph/film footage was taken, using the digital data we have available?
  • Can we confirm the time and place where the photograph/film footage was taken, using the visual evidence of the material?

To effectively find telltale signs of trouble spots, we need to know the most commonly used types of manipulation with false or misleading visual materials:

  • Wrong time/wrong place: The most commonly used types of misleading visual materials are old photographs or videos that are re-shared claiming to show something else. Viral spread in these cases occurs through accidental sharing of materials that can be easily discredited but are very difficult to remove from circulation.
  • Manipulated content: materials that have been manipulated using computer programs for editing photographs or film footage.
  • Staged materials: original materials that are created or distributed with the intent to mislead the public.

source: Journalism, 'Fake News' & Disinformation: A Manual for Training and Educating Journalists

Report

Help us improve by reporting your problems or suggestions.

0 / minimum 10 characters